News
News articles
The High Court has decided that NHS England’s controversial decision that it does not have the power to fund Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV was wrong.
DPG client Daniel Smith talks to the Guardian about his experiences of how the state responds to disability hate crime.
The Chairman Christopher Pitchford outline the terms and the process. Mr Brooks OBE has raised several initial concerns with the Secretary to the Inquiry. They are: The omission of covert recordings from the terms of reference – they appear to exclude the covert recording of...
On 21 July 2016 the Supreme Court allowed an application by DPG client Denise Brewster to instruct lawyers on a conditional fee
Interest in the outcome of NAT’s challenge to NHS controversial decision to not fund PrEP for HIV remains high. Judgement is expected in the next few weeks.
Allotment holders are fighting a third attempt by the Council to build on an allotment site that has served heavily-urbanised West Watford for 120 years.
Advocate General gives opinion in legal challenge on UK data retention law.
DPG have provided a submission to the Parliamentary JCHR, calling for practical reforms to enhance accountability for corporate human rights violations.
The High Court today declared that key parts of the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014 breach EU law and must be disapplied. The Act was rushed through parliament in one week in July 2014, allowing little time for thorough debate or civil society...
Ali Agab Nour, a Sudanese lawyer and refugee, will challenge the British Government’s decision to provide military training to the Sudanese Army today in the High Court. It is well-documented that the Sudanese Army regularly and systematically perpetrate truly appalling human rights violations including mass...
The National Aids Trust (NAT) is taking NHS England to court for refusing to provide PrEP, a “game changer” in the fight against HIV.
The All Party Parliamentary Group on Drones has successfully settled its Freedom of Information Challenge to the Cross-Government Working Group on Remotely Piloted Aerial Systems’s refusal to release details of its deliberations regarding drones policy in the UK. Unusually for a FOIA case, the parties...